Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated workflow configuration and permissions #90

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

manoelhc
Copy link
Owner

@manoelhc manoelhc commented Jun 7, 2024

Description

  • Removed unnecessary branches from the workflow configuration.
  • Updated the permissions in the workflow.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
qodana.yaml
Updated branches list and workflow permissions                     

.github/workflows/qodana.yaml
["Removed 'master' branch from the branches list", "Removed 'releases/*' branch from the branches list", 'Updated the workflow permissions']

+0/-3     

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Qodana CI workflow configuration to focus solely on the 'main' branch, eliminating the 'master' and 'releases/*' branches from the trigger list.

  • CI:
    • Updated the Qodana workflow to trigger only on pushes to the 'main' branch, removing triggers for 'master' and 'releases/*' branches.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request focuses on updating the GitHub Actions workflow configuration to only trigger on the 'main' branch, removing references to the 'master' and 'releases/*' branches.

File-Level Changes

Files Changes
.github/workflows/qodana.yaml Updated the workflow configuration to only trigger on the 'main' branch.

Tips
  • Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
    • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
    • Change the review language;
  • You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

deepsource-io bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits f1236c0..35bea3d. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregatePython
Branch Coverage87.9%87.9%
Condition Coverage87.9%87.9%
Composite Coverage96.2%96.2%
Line Coverage97.5%97.5%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2024
@penify-dev penify-dev bot changed the title fix: Keep just main branch Updated workflow configuration and permissions Jun 7, 2024
@manoelhc manoelhc merged commit da6ffe5 into feat/manoelhc-qodana Jun 7, 2024
11 of 15 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Jun 7, 2024

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

1, because the changes are straightforward and limited to removing unnecessary branches and updating permissions in the workflow configuration.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

⚡ Possible issues

No

🔒 Security concerns

No

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

No tag was generated due to PR title not compatible with Conventional Commits.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @manoelhc - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Jun 7, 2024

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
Maintainability
Simplify branch configuration and align indentation consistently

Consider simplifying the branch configuration by removing unnecessary comments and
aligning the indentation consistently.

.github/workflows/qodana.yaml [6-7]

-6      branches: # Specify your branches here
-7        - main # The 'main' branch
+6      branches:
+7        - main
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion simplifies the code by removing unnecessary comments and improves consistency in the indentation.

8

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Qodana Community for Python

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

Copy link
Contributor

codacy-production bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (f1236c0) 407 397 97.54%
Head commit (35bea3d) 407 (+0) 397 (+0) 97.54% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#90) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences


🚀 Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

manoelhc added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
* Create qodana.yaml

* fix: Keep just main branch (#90)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant