-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate logic in various components #1
Comments
As part of this separation it would be great if in splitting of (1) the other components could be edited to provide default values for all of the setup parameters. When initially setting up a definition it is very unclear what the expected number ranges for things like depth or smoothing are. It would also help in the 'out of the box' scenario to be able to just create a new component and be able to immediately see at least some form of output. |
Thanks for your feedback, Always good to know what was confusing for first-time users. |
Here are some ideas for the calibration component:
Not sure about the last one. What do you think, @philipbelesky ? Should this be done interactively, like it is now, or moved to an initial setup component and then hidden from the end-user to avoid visual clutter? |
For 1: shouldn't I think moving it to a distinct setup component in the long-term would be useful, particularly if additional optional settings are added (to reduce clutter). It would also be useful if additional components are added - e.g. for a raw |
Ad 1. The measurement would happen during the calibration phase, or any time the sensor is moved. One would then calibrate on a flat table, which also represents the lowest possible point on the model. Let's keep adding our ideas to the list for the setup component and once happy with the overall scope, break these down into individual issues. |
Create separate components for:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: