-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
MP-2615 rover rewards #273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are usages in the contracts where account ID is assumed to be ""
. I wonder if that poses safety issues. Shouldn't all of those function signatures accept account_id
now?
Unfortunatelly not, we have Red Bank users and rover accounts. |
* Add account_id for rover deposit rewards. * Use user addr and account id as compound key. * Apply comments.
* Add account_id for rover deposit rewards. * Use user addr and account id as compound key. * Apply comments.
Add support to track rover account ids in deposit/withdraw
Note: All migration for red bank will go in separate PR.