-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Muted users should not show up in notifications [Anti-harassment] #4172
Comments
cf. #3731 (comment) |
From Gargron:
It seems like there needs to be a way of muting someone's mentions without them knowing, though. |
The amount of previous bugs here means that this is a behavior that is surprising to users and either needs to be better explained in the application itself, or fixed so that it no longer surprises users. Either is a bug in the user experience of the application. I lean towards the "fixed" side because of @yiskah's compelling arguments towards why having this behavior is useful from an anti-harassment perspective, and my own experience with the mute functionality. I'm also down to split mute into "Hide from timeline" and "Hide from notifications", but i'm worried about the UX problems with such a distinction—how you would message it, if it would be "yet another" type of special-cased account interaction or if we need something more general on the backend, etc. etc. It gets very complex very fast both from a user and implementation perspective. |
@Cassolotl If you mute someone they don't know. They still see your profile and posts the same. As far as they know you're just ignoring them. Gargron is incorrect about the purpose of this feature like, we had to explain to him what a block is originally and then explained muting later. I think he should defer to those of us with more expertise in this area. If you want muted people to be able to call you a |
@yiskah Yeah! So it seems like the mute should be extended to notifications. :) I do agree with you.
I like this. |
un-assigning since it sounds like someone else is already working on the modal dialogue box idea. I'm not sure if I'm entirely sold on the benefit of that vs making all mutes work "correctly" vs adding a separate way of muting someone from the timeline (especially if we want to do a "follow but mute boots from X" later) |
Gosh we are so friggin' modular over here. Maybe we should just make a like "user content visibility panel" with all of this stuff? "Manage user visibility" or something
|
The primary function of muting for me, as a high follower-count user, is to remove someone's comments from my notifications without them knowing I have done so (via not seeing my posts etc). Block = "I don't want this person to see me", Mute = "I don't want to see this person." If I block a troll they claim it as a victory and I just get more trolls. If I block someone who is an "overzealous fan" I've had quite a few incidents of them tracking down my contact info (via my website, the mastodon discord server, etc.) and interrogating me on what they did wrong, when I never wanted to bother with that conversation and wished I could use mute to avoid that social drama. I also sometimes get others hearing I blocked someone and asking what they "did wrong" when it was really just that they replied to my posts too much with inane comments.
Expected behavior: A muted user's mentions or replies of me do not show up in my notifications, as on other social media.
Actual behavior (v1.4.1): A muter user's replies and mentions of me show up in my notifications.
Muting is essentially useless to me when it has such a large hole for harassment to go through. Blocking people who harass me always makes them go brag about it and then others seek to get blocked as well. I haven't muted any servers but if muting a server behaves like muting an individual user then that also removes that feature's anti-harassment aspect.
master
(If you're a user, don't worry about this).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: