Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify .well-known s2s discovery and X.509 validation #1830

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 1, 2019

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live commented Jan 31, 2019

Rendered: see 'docs' status check

Note to reviewers: This now includes MSC1831, which means this cannot land until the FCP has cleared.


Original proposals:

Implementation proofs:

There are no intentional changes which differ from the proposals in this commit, however the author has relied upon various historical conversations outside of the proposals to gain the required context. Inaccuracies introduced by the author are purely accidental.

Original proposals:
* #1708 (note: the JSON requirements were softened by #1824)
* #1711

Implementation proofs:
* matrix-org/synapse#4489
* No explicit PRs for MSC1711 could be found, however Synapse is known to implement it.

There are no intentional changes which differ from the proposals in this commit, however the author has relied upon various historical conversations outside of the proposals to gain the required context. Inaccuracies introduced by the author are purely accidental.
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

I've requested review from @richvdh specifically as I want to ensure I haven't accidentally screwed up the entire specification for these two proposals.

I'm also unsure if any of the perspectives stuff still applies for key exchange, such as the notary servers, and would like some feedback on whether or not that should be removed as well. My understanding is that it is no longer required.

Original proposal: #1831

Implementation proof: pending
Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and clear. A couple of tweaks needed though.

specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

@richvdh please take another look. Hopefully that's the last bits ironed out now.

Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I keep finding nits to pick at :/

specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/server_server_api.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Feb 1, 2019

No explicit PRs for MSC1711 could be found, however Synapse is known to implement it.

erm not yet it doesn't (matrix-org/synapse#4366)

richvdh and others added 2 commits February 1, 2019 07:40
Co-Authored-By: turt2live <travpc@gmail.com>
Note that MSC1831 changes the order, so the changes to MSC1708 might not make sense when combining all the proposals together. However, independently the change should make sense.
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

@richvdh no worries on nitpicking: I'd rather it be as perfect as it can be than wrong. Please take another look - I've applied your suggestions manually because the GitHub UI was fighting me.

Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

(landing this with anticipation that the FCPs are going to clear just fine - if this changes, we'll do the needed)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants