Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Get the rec-values documents actually compiling #46

Closed
ronaldtse opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Get the rec-values documents actually compiling #46

ronaldtse opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@opoudjis
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Unify titles and parts designation. What are the part numbers?
  2. Are these MEPs? I think so.
ronaldtse added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2020
@ronaldtse
Fix up rec-values metadata, prepare for #46
8c31c1d
@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 9, 2020
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

opoudjis commented Nov 18, 2020 •
edited
Loading

They clearly are MEPs.

We have created docnumber SI MEP A1 etc for the existing MEPs, based on their units. Insane though it is. https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/mises-en-pratique/standard-frequencies.html indicates that these documents are identified by their frequency, although mu is posing a challenge. So, SI MEP M REC (frequency/wavelength). Adding Atom in case of ambiguity.

Part number 1 is inherited from the Metre MEP.

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

Compiled.

opoudjis added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2020
@opoudjis
rec-values: #46
450536a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@opoudjis opoudjis

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ronaldtse @opoudjis