Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2020. It is now read-only.

Implement included view support #621

Closed
teosarca opened this issue Apr 8, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Implement included view support #621

teosarca opened this issue Apr 8, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@teosarca
Copy link
Member

teosarca commented Apr 8, 2017

Type of issue

Feature request

Current behavior

Expected behavior

From now on, our view rows might support an included view (similar to attributes).
If the included view is supported, the row has the "supportIncludedViews" to true. Else the flag won't be set at all.

If a given row has an included view, when user is selecting that row, frontend shall:

Steps to reproduce

Our current test case is:

  • open manufacturing order view: https://w101.metasfresh.com:8443/window/53009
  • select a manufacturing order where u can call "Issue/Receive" quick action
  • select a line where you can issue raw products (i.e. BOMType is COmponent)
  • that line shall have the supportIncludedViews=true
  • at this point, the frontend shall fetch the included viewId and it shall display it to user
@cadavre
Copy link
Contributor

cadavre commented Apr 10, 2017

How will we differentiate if it should be document (attributes?) or gridview (HUs)?

@damianprzygodzki
Copy link
Contributor

Should we think about displaying attributes and gridviews at the same time? There is no place for that, should we display it one below another?

@damianprzygodzki damianprzygodzki self-assigned this Apr 10, 2017
@cadavre
Copy link
Contributor

cadavre commented Apr 10, 2017

Not the same time, but we might have attributes (for HU editor) OR gridview (for Manufacturing).

@teosarca @metas-mk are we up-to-date with https://preview.uxpin.com/4eb44389238c83379a04a6db7ae29b46be7d4aae#/pages/67603587/simulate/no-panels ?

@metas-mk
Copy link
Member

@cadavre Yes, pls. We are up-to-date. We will go w/ your last proposal. thx.

@metas-mk
Copy link
Member

belongs to #580

@damianprzygodzki
Copy link
Contributor

Closing due to deprecation and rest of the case will be proceeded in #630

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants