-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
Description
Search Terms
compiler api, module resolution, module specifier resolution
Suggestion
Given this source:
import { bar } from "./bar";
it would be helpful if there were an API that could tell us where "./bar" points.
The most minimal way of implementing this that I know of is to make ts.SourceFile["resolvedModules"]
public API. The SourceFile
object already has this property, but typescript.d.ts does not expose the type for it.
Note that API Extractor already uses `ts.SourceFile["resolvedModules"].
- API Extractor uses
resolvedModules
via a cast toany
Use Cases
What do you want to use this for?
The checker's knowledge of the module graph seems generally useful, but my specific current use case is crawling .d.ts files, given some entry points, to remove things that are not part of a package's public API. The general idea has some overlap with API Extractor but with smaller and more specific scope.
What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
typeChecker.getSymbolAtLocation
seemed promising, but does not do exactly what I I'm looking for, because it follows the entire chain of aliases, skipping intermediate nodes. So the liveness analysis that I'm doing will (incorrectly) consider the intermediate nodes non-live. In the following case, It's not correct (for my purposes) to ignore "bar.ts":
// foo.ts
import { bar } from "./bar"
// bar.ts
export { bar } from "./baz"
// baz.ts
export const bar = 3;
adapted from a StackOverflow question
Examples
const sourceFile = program.getSourceFile(sourceFileName);
if (sourceFile) {
// this code works at runtime currently
// but requires a cast in order to acces at `resolvedModules`
const resolvedModule = sourceFile.resolvedModules.get(moduleSpecifier);
// ... use resolvedModule in analysis
}
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.