Skip to content

Conversation

sandersn
Copy link
Member

Fall back to the assignment's declaration; don't use the property's valueDeclaration because that is not useful when the property comes from a spread. The fallback now happens when the property's valueDeclaration does not have the object literal's first declaration as an ancestor.

Fixes #16473

sandersn added 3 commits June 14, 2017 11:26
Fall back to the assignment's declaration; don't use the property's
valueDeclaration because that is not useful when the property comes from
a spread. The fallback now happens when the property's valueDeclaration
does not have the object literal's valueDeclaration as an ancestor.
valueDeclaration is frequently not set
@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

Seems pretty reasonable, but leave a comment in the code on what would happen if you weren't doing this check. 👍

@mhegazy
Copy link
Contributor

mhegazy commented Jun 14, 2017

Please port to release-2.4

@sandersn sandersn merged commit 26ab0cd into master Jun 14, 2017
@sandersn sandersn deleted the excess-property-check-error-span-for-spread-property branch June 14, 2017 23:16
@sandersn
Copy link
Member Author

Ported to release-2.4

@mohsen1 mohsen1 mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2017
@microsoft microsoft locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 14, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants