Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Agenda: Development, Dec 27 #29

Closed
lehnberg opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Agenda: Development, Dec 27 #29

lehnberg opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
development Anything related to development meetings Anything related to meetings

Comments

@lehnberg
Copy link
Collaborator

lehnberg commented Dec 16, 2018

Solicit suggestions for agenda items for the Development meeting to be held on Thursday Dec 27 @ 15:00 UTC in Grin/Dev Gitter. Please comment to provide topics or suggestions.

Proposed agenda

  1. Igno's Retrospective
  2. Agenda review
  3. Action point follow ups from previous meetings
  4. PoW general item
  5. Results from libsecp audit
    1. Related: Security checklist grin#2218
  6. Mainnet planning
    1. Betanet status
    2. Genesis status
  7. Post-mainnet release planning.
    1. How do we plan releases?
    2. How do we decide what features go into each release?
  8. Other questions
@lehnberg lehnberg added meetings Anything related to meetings development Anything related to development labels Dec 16, 2018
@yeastplume
Copy link
Member

I do think we need to start thinking about post-mainnet release planning. Specifically, how we plan releases and how we decide what features go into each release. This topic probably crosses over with governance

@lehnberg lehnberg changed the title Agenda: Development, Dec 25 Agenda: Development, Dec 27 Dec 24, 2018
@lehnberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Agenda updated, added this point. I think it makes sense to have it be development driven.

@ignopeverell
Copy link
Contributor

We should also discuss current results from the code review of libsecp and its use in Grin.

@lehnberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Makes sense, updated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
development Anything related to development meetings Anything related to meetings
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants