Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update version for govulncheck #4898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2024
Merged

Update version for govulncheck #4898

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

donatello
Copy link
Member

@donatello donatello commented Apr 11, 2024

Description

Build with latest golang to fix vulncheck error.

Motivation and Context

How to test this PR?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Fixes a regression (If yes, please add commit-id or PR # here)
  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Internal documentation updated
  • Create a documentation update request here

@donatello donatello changed the title fix: min. go version to 1.20 and fix std lib vuln. Update version for govulncheck Apr 11, 2024
@donatello
Copy link
Member Author

@harshavardhana we can take this to let other PRs to stop failing on vulncheck

@donatello donatello requested a review from poornas April 11, 2024 23:28
@donatello donatello mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2024
8 tasks
@harshavardhana harshavardhana merged commit 6bac84d into minio:master Apr 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@donatello donatello deleted the deps branch April 12, 2024 00:45
zveinn added a commit to zveinn/mc that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
zveinn added a commit to zveinn/mc that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants