Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

library redesign code cleanup #1312

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 15, 2017

Conversation

Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor

@Be-ing Be-ing commented Jul 13, 2017

Reading through the code for the library redesign branch, I got really confused between "MixxxLibrary" and the generic term "Library". So rename the "MixxxLibrary" classes to "Tracks", matching the new label in the GUI.

"MixxxLibrary" is easy to confuse with the generic term "Library"
@daschuer
Copy link
Member

Hi Be, I like the change. It will introduce dome conflicts in pending PR, probably easy to resolve.
But is it worth the work? I am unsure.
@uklotzde: what do you think?

@Be-ing Be-ing changed the title rename MixxxLibraryFeature/TreeModel -> TracksFeature/TreeModel library redesign code cleanup Jul 13, 2017
@Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Jul 13, 2017

I am finding the changes in this branch really confusing. I cannot understand it to help @gramanas with his work without cleaning it up. It may create some conflicts with #1304 but those should be easy to resolve.

@Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Jul 13, 2017

It is a bit concerning to see SQL all over the GUI code. I think that should be factored out of the LibraryFeatures like CrateStorage, but I'll leave that as a to-do task for now. Maybe you want to take care of that @uklotzde?

@Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Jul 15, 2017

I tested merging this with #1304, it only creates 2 small conflicts that are very easy to resolve.

@daschuer
Copy link
Member

Ok, then let's merge this. Thank you.

@daschuer daschuer merged commit 454e6c1 into mixxxdj:jmigual-library-redesign Jul 15, 2017
@Be-ing Be-ing deleted the tracks_feature branch July 15, 2017 13:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants