Skip to content

Releases: mnasuharas/Docutis

v0.2.0-preview.1 — Public preview (not clinical approval)

Choose a tag to compare

@mnasuharas mnasuharas released this 30 Sep 00:06

Docutis 0.2.0-preview.1 is a 0.x educational preview. It is not a stable 1.0, not production-ready, and not clinician approval of unreviewed content. A software tag does not clinically validate medical statements.

Highlights

  • A five-case trainer (inspect, observe, differential, reveal, review) on top of the v0.1.0-preview.1 reference.
  • Diagnosis stays concealed until reveal: neutral image filenames, image text, and diagnosis-bearing source links.
  • Public ways to report bugs, clinical corrections, outdated evidence, feature ideas, and media or license problems.

What changed

Since annotated tag v0.1.0-preview.1 (a278393897b0a72439ae6960c69699a65fbea8f1, 2026-09-23):

  • Added five open-license pilot cases. None is clinician reviewed.
  • Published physician decisions already on main for actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, BCC German follow-up, the BCC dermoscopy quiz item, and the BCC clues schematic.
  • Fixed Chrome UX: focus, surface, and shadow tokens; primary links stay available on narrow widths; reduced-motion scrolling; a no-JavaScript notice that does not copy clinical text.
  • Added release-readiness docs and issue forms for evidence updates and media/license reports. Outdated-evidence links open the evidence form.

Not in this tag: Goal 14 / pull request #21 (pilot-case clinical review). It is still open, not merged, and not an approval.

Clinical governance status

From node scripts/review-governance.js on c28f1de75965026af25fb2d231c65e2d5f26ab3f:

  • 28 units, 5 decisions, 1 consented public reviewer, latest valid human review date 2026-09-23.
  • Clinician reviewed (5): actinic keratosis disease, basal cell carcinoma disease, BCC German follow-up, BCC dermoscopy quiz item, BCC clues schematic.
  • Review required (23), including every pilot case: acral melanoma (plantar), nodular BCC dermoscopy, pigmented BCC dermoscopy, actinic keratosis field on the hand, and cSCC with adjacent AK. Those five cases remain review required.
  • Legacy catalogue fields for all 50 disease records stay clinician review required unless a public Goal 9 decision says otherwise. Automated tests are not clinician review.

This release is not clinical approval of the 23 review-required units.

Licensing

  • Code and docs: MIT (LICENSE). MIT does not relicense images.
  • Four original schematics: Project-owned, attribution “Docutis project”.
  • Case photographs keep their own licenses and required attribution: four CC BY 4.0 (Xavier-Júnior et al. 2015, Diagnostic Pathology; Dr. Thomas Brinkmeier / WIKIDERM for nodular BCC, pigmented BCC, and AK field) and one CC BY-SA 4.0 (Dermanonymous, cSCC with adjacent AK). Images are not MIT.

Browser and support

Verified only in Google Chrome 151.0.7922.169 on Debian/Linux (desktop, 768px, and 390×700), including a known minor focus-outline clip on the 390px nav strip. Not a phone test and not a screen-reader test. Firefox, Edge, and Safari were not run.

Known limitations

  • Educational preview with incomplete coverage. Not a substitute for individual care and not validated clinical decision support.
  • Most assets are still review required, including all five pilot cases.
  • Older notes on v0.1.0-preview.1 described an earlier review count and do not match this tag.

Validation

Passed on c28f1de75965026af25fb2d231c65e2d5f26ab3f (Node v20.19.2): node --check lists from .github/workflows/validate.yml, node scripts/case.js, node scripts/clinical-review.js --validate, node scripts/clinical-schema.js, node scripts/follow-up.js, node scripts/media.js, node scripts/quiz.js, node scripts/review-governance.js (and --write plus node scripts/review-batch.js --write with no artifact diff), node --test tests/*.test.js (138 pass, 0 fail), git diff --check.

Feedback

Do not include patient-identifiable information.

Upgrade notes

This is the second tagged preview, not the first. Re-check clinical-review counts; v0.1.0-preview.1 notes are point-in-time and do not describe this commit. Public reviewer shown with consent: Murat Nasuh Aras, physician in dermatology specialty training. That consent does not extend review to unreviewed assets.

v0.1.0-preview.1 — Public preview (Goal 10)

Choose a tag to compare

@mnasuharas mnasuharas released this 23 Sep 10:25
a278393

What you can do

  • Browse the educational dermatology reference at https://mnasuharas.github.io/Docutis/
  • Read About / project status, open the GitHub repo, and follow Contributing, Roadmap, Changelog and Releases links from the site.
  • Use Suggest a correction or Report outdated evidence to open the clinical content issue form (include record/page, claim, verifiable source and proposed correction; never include patient-identifiable information).

Goal 10 changes

  • Public OSS surface: discoverable repository and documentation links in navigation and footer.
  • About / project-status section for clinicians and the public.
  • Feedback CTAs on condition details and the clinical review area.
  • Docs aligned (README, CONTRIBUTING, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG).

Pending clinical review

  • All 23 Goal 9 pilot review units remain review required.
  • 0 clinician-reviewed assets. No reviewer identities, dates or approvals were invented for this release.

Limitations

  • Public preview only — not a clinically reviewed release and not production-ready.
  • Not validated clinical decision support; content is educational draft material, not clinician-approved recommendations.
  • Coverage is incomplete; always verify against current guidelines and professional judgment.

How to report corrections

Open a GitHub issue with the Clinical content correction template (clinical_content.yml), or use the on-site feedback CTAs. Do not submit patient-identifiable information.