-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose ignore_json, add ignore_nosub to file match/search funcs #1281
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Co-authored-by: Richard Höchenberger <richard.hoechenberger@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kaare-mikkelsen I have also taken the liberty to add you to our authors and citation lists, as well as to create an entry for the changelog. Note that these are steps in our contribution guide, but given that I was so late with reviewing your PR, I felt a bit guilty and added this for you 👼
one more note for your (potential) future contributions (to any GitHub project): You have forked mne-bids under a new name: https://github.com/kaare-mikkelsen/mne-bids_fixing --> this was making it a bit hard for me to work with your original PR. If possible, please fork repositories under their real name, and then develop under a new branch (not main
, like you did for your contribution). I hope this feedback helps! :-)
thank you, the feedback does help :) |
Hi @sappelhoff |
Yes, I made your changes configurable and put the default on previous behavior, as you correctly point out. My reasoning is that the current behavior has been in place for a long time, with only one report (yours) about it being different from expected. I think it is the safe route to keep the behavior as is, and leave the option open to change the default if we see more reports of the nature of the report you gave earlier. |
@sappelhoff I won't have any time to look into this for the next couple of days, sorry please ping me again sometime at the end of the week if you still need my feedback thanks |
I' appreciate it, but no worries if you don't find the time for it. I'll basically leave this open for a potential review of yours until next Monday or so and just merge otherwise. If any other mne devs read this, feel free to chime in, too 🙏 |
Thanks for your contribution @kaare-mikkelsen! |
find_matching_paths
to only look outside ofderivatives/
#1127 by replacing it@kaare-mikkelsen I have finally had time to look at your PR. I suggest the following changes to it. This is mainly about making the newly proposed funcationality configurable via a parameter that is exposed via the public API.
What do you think?
Any thoughts @hoechenberger?