Mime type name inconsistent in http problem section 9

[pezra]

listed as application/json-problem but then the sub-type is declared as problem+json

[pezra]

Fwiw, i very much prefer application/problem+json.

[mnot]

Fixed, thanks. +json doesn't quite yet exist.

[pezra]

By what definition does '+json' not exist? Its meaning is convention rather than normative, but there is absolutely no confusion about its meaning. In what sense does 'json-' exist if '+json' doesn't?

[mnot]

See:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-01

This registers the convention; it's not final yet.

[pezra]

In that case i'd say jump on board the rough consensus.

On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Mark Nottingham wrote:

See:

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-01

This registers the convention; it's not final yet.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#2 (comment)