-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unify naming of "continuous states" and "derivatives" in API and XML #1355
Unify naming of "continuous states" and "derivatives" in API and XML #1355
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want to be correct, you have to call "states" "continuous-time states" and their derivatives "continuous-time state derivatives".
So your suggestion is now a compromise that uses longer names and still is not correct.
You even removed at least one "-time" where it makes perfect sense.
If we want to keep it short (and I would prefer short) we need to ask: is there a way to reasonably misunderstand what is ment. I see little danger of that.
The correct term would be "continuous w.r.t. the independent variable". But is continuous ever referring to something else in the document? If not we could just state that and use "continuous".
See above.
By accident. Fixed it. |
We do have discrete states. Well, discrete w.r.t. value and discrete w.r.t. time. |
The question is: do we currently or will we ever have to refer to these in the docs? |
We refer to discrete states, yes - there it is always clear what we mean. |
WEB design meeting: agreed with Torsten´s proposal. |
to clearly distinguish the different types of derivatives in
and
fixes #1343