Skip to content

Conversation

Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug by refining the handling of the problem_type parameter, particularly for reward models and single-label classification tasks. The change ensures that the problem_type is correctly inferred as 'regression' when appropriate, improving the accuracy of model configuration. The corresponding documentation has also been updated to clearly explain this new behavior.

Highlights

  • Default problem_type: The default value for the problem_type parameter has been changed from 'single_label_classification' to None in the argument definitions, allowing for dynamic assignment.
  • Dynamic problem_type Assignment: The system now automatically sets problem_type to 'regression' for sequence classification tasks if the model is identified as a reward model (model_meta.is_reward) or if num_labels is 1. Otherwise, it defaults to 'single_label_classification' when problem_type is not explicitly provided.
  • Documentation Updates: The documentation for problem_type in both Chinese and English has been updated to reflect the new default behavior and the logic for automatic assignment based on reward models or num_labels.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly adjusts the default problem_type for reward models to 'regression'. The changes involve updating the default value in argument classes to None and adding logic to infer the correct problem_type during model initialization. The documentation has also been updated accordingly. The logic is sound and fixes the intended issue. I've added one minor suggestion to improve code clarity.

Comment on lines 720 to 725
if problem_type is None:
if model_info.num_labels == 1 or model_meta.is_reward:
problem_type = 'regression'
else:
problem_type = 'single_label_classification'
model_info.config.problem_type = problem_type
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better readability and to make the logic more direct, you could refactor this block to avoid reassigning the problem_type variable and instead directly assign to model_info.config.problem_type within the conditional branches. This makes the flow of control clearer.

Suggested change
if problem_type is None:
if model_info.num_labels == 1 or model_meta.is_reward:
problem_type = 'regression'
else:
problem_type = 'single_label_classification'
model_info.config.problem_type = problem_type
if problem_type is None:
if model_info.num_labels == 1 or model_meta.is_reward:
model_info.config.problem_type = 'regression'
else:
model_info.config.problem_type = 'single_label_classification'
else:
model_info.config.problem_type = problem_type

@Jintao-Huang Jintao-Huang merged commit e7df8fa into modelscope:main Oct 9, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants