Skip to content

Conversation

dariakp
Copy link
Contributor

@dariakp dariakp commented Jun 11, 2021

Description

NODE-3288

see also #2838

filterOutCommands,
ignoreNsNotFound
} = require('./shared');
const { loadSpecTests } = require('../spec');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we rename this to command_monitoring.test.js to match the directory name change? Or would you rather do that as part of the greater test cleanup? I'm fine either way.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought about doing it, but (1) I wasn't sure if we had in progress work touching this file and what potential merge conflict issues that might cause and (2) there are a lot of references to APM throughout and as you pointed out, the greater test refactor later is likely going to change a lot of things around, so not sure it's worth doing it

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think it's fine to wait. LGTM.

@durran durran requested review from emadum and nbbeeken June 15, 2021 16:18
@durran durran added the Team Review Needs review from team label Jun 15, 2021
@dariakp dariakp force-pushed the NODE-3288/add-test-for-security-sensitive-event-redaction branch from da577c3 to cbe0f89 Compare June 15, 2021 17:48
@durran durran marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2021 18:18
@durran durran merged commit abf01fc into 4.0 Jun 15, 2021
@durran durran deleted the NODE-3288/add-test-for-security-sensitive-event-redaction branch June 15, 2021 19:00
ljhaywar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
* refactor: rename apm spec directory to command-monitoring

* Sync redacted commands spec tests

* Skip failing spec tests

* Move legacy command-monitoring spec tests into their own folder
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Team Review Needs review from team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants