Skip to content

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y just published its new version 1.2.2, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 6 commits .

  • 4c54152 1.2.2
  • 1d0be0b [docs] - Update CHANGELOG
  • bbcc1a2 [fix] Fix checks involving the tabIndex attribute that do not account for integer literals (#48)
  • c2ccd06 [build] - Add node v6 to travis build check
  • 5d4fa08 Remove normalization of component names when mapping to DOM elements. (#47)
  • 5234789 [docs] - Provide more clarity about destructuring props over rest spread.

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 288fd22 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y-1.2.2 into 2dbe4b7 on master.

@addons-robot addons-robot force-pushed the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y-1.2.2 branch from 288fd22 to a06fd04 Compare May 20, 2016 17:20
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling a06fd04 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y-1.2.2 into 8c179c8 on master.

@addons-robot addons-robot force-pushed the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y-1.2.2 branch from a06fd04 to 1769828 Compare May 27, 2016 11:58
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 1769828 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y-1.2.2 into 99d4c02 on master.

@muffinresearch muffinresearch merged commit 506410d into master May 27, 2016
@muffinresearch muffinresearch deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y-1.2.2 branch May 27, 2016 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants