Skip to content

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

react-addons-css-transition-group just published its new version 15.2.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency react-addons-css-transition-group
New version 15.2.1
Type dependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of react-addons-css-transition-group.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@addons-robot addons-robot force-pushed the greenkeeper-react-addons-css-transition-group-15.2.1 branch 2 times, most recently from d7ca050 to bbfb8d5 Compare July 12, 2016 17:19
@addons-robot addons-robot force-pushed the greenkeeper-react-addons-css-transition-group-15.2.1 branch from bbfb8d5 to 75893a1 Compare July 13, 2016 10:54
@muffinresearch muffinresearch merged commit dd2c00e into master Jul 13, 2016
@muffinresearch muffinresearch deleted the greenkeeper-react-addons-css-transition-group-15.2.1 branch July 13, 2016 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants