Skip to content

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

mocha just published its new version 3.0.2.

State Update 🚀
Dependency mocha
New version 3.0.2
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of mocha.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 6 commits .

  • 2a51080 Release v3.0.2
  • f811d44 prep release v3.0.2 [ci skip]
  • bbc1682 avoid define() calls in dependencies; closes #2424 (#2425)
  • 2f21eb0 Merge pull request #2419 from not-an-aardvark/2417-only-within-only
  • 53344e9 remove references to json-cov and html-cov reporters from executable
  • 8531585 fix .only suites nested within each other; closes #2417

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 8, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 9384894 on greenkeeper-mocha-3.0.2 into 74d7541 on master.

@kumar303 kumar303 merged commit 050abc2 into master Aug 8, 2016
@kumar303 kumar303 deleted the greenkeeper-mocha-3.0.2 branch August 8, 2016 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants