Skip to content

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Dec 28, 2016

Version 2.5.39 of @types/jasmine just got published.

Dependency @types/jasmine
Current Version 2.5.38
Type devDependency

The version 2.5.39 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of @types/jasmine.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e495d3d on greenkeeper/@types/jasmine-2.5.39 into 63e4214 on master.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 29, 2016

Version 2.5.40 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jan 17, 2017

Version 2.5.41 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Feb 10, 2017

Version 2.5.42 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Feb 14, 2017

Version 2.5.43 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

@mseemann mseemann merged commit f3b8b85 into master Feb 14, 2017
@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot deleted the greenkeeper/@types/jasmine-2.5.39 branch February 14, 2017 20:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants