git cascade and git forward-merge

This package contains the following scripts:

• git cascade - Cascade changes from each branch to its dependents.
• git forward-merge - Merge branches without checking them out.

Requirements

• Python 3.x. (Which must be accessible using python3; if you're on Windows you might need to set this up.)

Installation

Installation is manual unfortunately, and basically involves putting both scripts in a directory that's in your $PATH. After downloading/cloning the repo, follow the instructions according to your operating system:

Linux

Copy the two script files to /usr/local/bin. That's it.

Windows (with Bash shell)

On Windows with Msysgit, you can copy them into C:\Program Files (x86)\Git\bin.

Following caveats:

• You will probably have to replace the shebang line with #!c:\python34\python.exe or wherever else you have Python 3 installed.
• You can only run these scripts from the Git Bash. If you haven't installed Msysgit with Git Bash Here option, invoke bin\bash.exe.
• You have to run git-cascade and git-forward-merge instead of git cascade and git forward-merge due to Windows shenanigans.

Mac

Peruse [this guide] (http://shapeshed.com/using_custom_shell_scripts_on_osx_or_linux/) and use it for the two scripts in this repo.

git cascade - Cascade changes from each branch to its dependents.

This command:

git cascade foo master

Merges the branch foo into branch master, and into every branch that's behind master (regarding the cascade order, not to confuse with Git's 'ahead'/'behind'-terminology which is referring to tracking branches). What does that mean?

In many projects, there's a progressive order of branches that changes go through. For example:

development > staging > master

This means that a new change might first get committed into development, then after testing will be merged into staging, then after further testing get merged into master.

That's all well and good, but sometimes you want to take a shortcut and push a change directly into a more advanced branch. (This can happen if the change is small enough that you're sure it won't break anything, or the change is urgent and needs to be pushed to production immediately, or a bunch of other reasons.) In these cases, you want to push to master, and automatically push to all branches that are behind master in the cascade order. In our example, if you run:

git cascade foo master

The changes in foo will be automatically pushed to master, staging and development, all in one command, without having to check any of them out.

If you were to type:

git cascade foo staging

Then the changes will be pushed only to staging and development, with master remaining untouched.

Defining cascades

To define the cascade order for your project, put it in this format in your project config: (.git/config)

[git-cascade]
    cascade = development > staging > master

You may also include multiple lines to define more complex cascade trees:

[git-cascade]
    cascade = development > staging > master
    cascade = other_development > staging

git cascade will do the right thing when cascading.

Run git cascade --show to show the list of current cascades.

Alternate forms

If using three or more arguments, the branch specified in the first argument will be cascaded into all the other branches, and all their dependents. So this:

git cascade foo staging whatever

Will cascade foo into staging, whatever and all of their dependents.

If only one argument is specified, git cascade will assume you want to cascade HEAD (the current commit) into the specified branch. So this:

git cascade staging

Will cascade HEAD into staging and all of its dependents.

How does it work?

The merges in git cascade are done by git forward-merge, which creates a temporary git index file and working directory to be used only for the merge, without interfering with the actual index file and working directory. (Unless the merge is a fast-forward, in which case the merge is done trivially by a local push.)

Limitation

git cascade works only when the merge can be done automatically. It doesn't work for merges that require conflict resolution. For that, please resort to using git merge.

If you do attempt a cascade that results in a merge that requires conflict resolution, git cascade will abort the merge and leave your working directory clean, UNLESS the branch you're merging to is the current branch, in which case it will leave the merge in the working directory for you to resolve the conflict and commit, just like git merge.

(If there were multiple merges, all merges up to the failing one will be completed in the repo.)

Branch aliases

You may use branch aliases when using git cascade. So, if you defined something like this in your config, (either the repo-specific config or the global one):

[git-branch-aliases]
    s = staging
    m = master

And then run:

git cascade foo m

It will cascade foo into master and all of its dependents.

git forward-merge - Merge branches without checking them out.

This command was written in order to solve an annoyance with the built-in git merge. The annoying thing about git merge is that if one wants to merge branch foo into branch bar, one first needs to check out branch bar, and only then merge foo into it. This can become a drag, especially when having an unclean working tree.

Enter git forward-merge. All pushes done with it work regardless of which branch is currently checked out and which files are in the working tree.

Push branch foo into bar:

git forward-merge foo bar

Push current branch/commit into bar:

git forward-merge bar

Push branch foo into bar, baz and meow:

git forward-merge foo bar baz meow

How does it work?

git forward-merge creates a temporary git index file and working directory to be used only for the merge, without interfering with the actual index file and working directory. (Unless the merge is a fast-forward, in which case the merge is done trivially by a local push.)

Limitation

git forward-merge works only when the merge can be done automatically. It doesn't work for merges that require conflict resolution. For that, please resort to using git merge.

If you do attempt a merge that requires conflict resolution, git forward-merge will abort the merge and leave your working directory clean, UNLESS the branch you're merging to is the current branch, in which case it will leave the merge in the working directory for you to resolve the conflict and commit, just like git merge.

Branch aliases

You may use branch aliases when using git forward-merge. So, if you defined something like this in your config, (either the repo-specific config or the global one):

[git-branch-aliases]
    s = staging
    m = master

And then run:

git forward-merge s m

It will merge staging into master.

Copyright and license

Both scripts are copyright 2009-2014 Ram Rachum and are released under the MIT license.