Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Docs for adding LayerData tuple to viewer #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2023
Merged

Docs for adding LayerData tuple to viewer #152

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

dstansby
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This adds some short docs for adding a LayerData tuple to the napari viewer. Replaces napari/napari#4711.

Type of change

  • Fixes or improves existing content
  • Adds new content page(s)
  • Fixes or improves workflow, documentation build or deployment

References

Final checklist:

  • My PR is the minimum possible work for the desired functionality
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added alt text to new images included in this PR

@dstansby dstansby mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
Closed
12 tasks
@psobolewskiPhD psobolewskiPhD added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation content Ideas for new or improved content labels May 14, 2023
@jni jni merged commit 85b7642 into napari:main Jun 22, 2023
3 checks passed
@dstansby dstansby deleted the adding-layer-data branch June 22, 2023 08:41
@psobolewskiPhD psobolewskiPhD added this to the 0.4.18 milestone Jun 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jni jni jni approved these changes

@tlambert03 tlambert03 Awaiting requested review from tlambert03

@Czaki Czaki Awaiting requested review from Czaki

Assignees

@dstansby dstansby

Labels
content Ideas for new or improved content documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.4.18
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@dstansby @jni @psobolewskiPhD