refactor: borrow the sonic-rs string escape implementation

[Brooooooklyn]

https://github.com/cloudwego/sonic-rs is faster than our previous implementation, but we don't want to use it directly.

1. Using sonic-rs only for string escaping would significantly increase the build time.
2. Using sonic-rs only for string escaping introduces unnecessary abstraction overhead.

For small inputs:

sonic_rs::to_string(source).unwrap()

vs

json_escape_simd::escape(source)

Benchmarking short string escape simd: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5
short string escape simd
                        time:   [91.420 ns 91.942 ns 92.492 ns]
                        change: [−4.1512% −3.5514% −2.9689%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high mild

Benchmarking short string escape sonic: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 
short string escape sonic
                        time:   [200.26 ns 201.38 ns 202.58 ns]
                        change: [−3.9808% −3.4283% −2.8871%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        Performance has improved.

[Brooooooklyn]

• refactor: borrow the sonic-rs string escape implementation #27 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #27 will improve performances by 25.75%

_{Comparing 10-11-bench_add_sonic-rs_benchmark (605d6da) with main (85a3cca)}

Summary

⚡ 2 improvements
🆕 1 new
⏩ 8 skipped¹

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
⚡	fixtures escape simd	40.4 ms	31.4 ms	+28.89%
⚡	rxjs escape simd	1,179.7 µs	938.1 µs	+25.75%
🆕	short string escape simd	N/A	2.3 µs	N/A

Footnotes

1. 8 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the library to borrow the sonic-rs string escape implementation instead of using the original custom SIMD implementations. The change aims to improve performance, particularly for small inputs, while avoiding the overhead of using sonic-rs directly as a dependency.

• Replaced custom x86 and aarch64 SIMD implementations with sonic-rs borrowed code
• Removed platform-specific modules and feature flags
• Updated benchmarks to include sonic-rs comparisons and short string tests

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
src/lib.rs	Complete rewrite using sonic-simd crate with borrowed string escaping logic
src/x86.rs	Removed entire x86-specific SIMD implementation
src/aarch64.rs	Removed entire aarch64 NEON implementation
examples/escape.rs	Updated to compare against sonic-rs and serde_json
benches/escape.rs	Added sonic-rs benchmark and short string tests
benches/generic.rs	Removed unused escape_into_generic function
Cargo.toml	Added sonic-simd, sonic-rs dependencies and updated criterion
README.md	Updated documentation to reflect sonic-rs implementation
.github/workflows/CI.yml	Added miri testing workflow

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[Brooooooklyn]

@codex review

[Brooooooklyn]

cursor review

[cursor]

Skipping Bugbot: Bugbot is disabled for this repository

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

[Brooooooklyn]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.