Skip to content

Conversation

alexfoxgill
Copy link
Contributor

I hope I did this right - here is the accompanying implementation https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/29934

@renetapopova renetapopova self-assigned this Mar 4, 2025
@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, @alexfoxgill. It looks good. We just need to add it to the errors/gql-errors/index.adoc page as well. We plan to generate the index automatically, but for now, we do it manually.

Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

Depends on the attached PR.

@alexfoxgill
Copy link
Contributor Author

@renetapopova linked PR is now merged

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit 4f241fa into neo4j:dev Mar 19, 2025
4 checks passed
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Mar 19, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

NataliaIvakina pushed a commit to NataliaIvakina/docs-status-codes that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
I hope I did this right - here is the accompanying implementation
neo-technology/neo4j#29934
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants