Skip to content

[NAE-1381] Public view task loading #51

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 27, 2022
Merged

[NAE-1381] Public view task loading #51

merged 7 commits into from
May 27, 2022

Conversation

Daniell7
Copy link
Contributor

@Daniell7 Daniell7 commented May 6, 2022

Description

Set LoadingEmitter while system creating new case

Fixed NAE-1381

Dependencies

none

Third party dependencies

No new dependencies were introduced

Blocking Pull requests

There are no dependencies on other PR

How Has Been This Tested?

Assisted testing + manual testing + front-end tests

Test Configuration

Name Tested on
OS Windows 10
Runtime Node 12.18.3
Dependency Manager NPM 6.14.6
Framework version Angular 10
Run parameters
Other configuration

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My changes have been checked, personally or remotely, with @camperko
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have resolved all conflicts with the target branch of the PR
  • I have updated and synced my code with the target branch
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing tests pass locally with my changes:
    • Lint test
    • Unit tests
    • Integration tests
  • I have checked my contribution with code analysis tools:
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation:
    • Developer documentation
    • User Guides
    • Migration Guides

- add new service: public-task-loading.service.ts
- update publicBaseFilterFactory in PublicTaskViewComponent
- add tests and update return expression
@Daniell7 Daniell7 requested a review from machacjozef May 18, 2022 12:47
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 63 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Small
Size       : +58 -5
Percentile : 25.2%

Total files changed: 6

Change summary by file extension:
.ts : +58 -5

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

63.6% 63.6% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@tuplle tuplle merged commit 788bcb9 into release/6.1.0 May 27, 2022
@tuplle tuplle deleted the NAE-1381 branch May 27, 2022 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants