Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use Iterable instead of Seq for MapRecords #11

Closed
franbh opened this issue Feb 16, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Use Iterable instead of Seq for MapRecords #11

franbh opened this issue Feb 16, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@franbh
Copy link
Contributor

franbh commented Feb 16, 2018

This would allow us to map Sets and Maps, instead of being restricted to collections that inherit from Seq.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@franbh