-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[newrelic-pixie] newrelic-pixie init container not running on arm64 #1152
Comments
The pixie repo seems to use this "multiarch" tagged image.
My suspicion is that the helm chart may not have the latest changes to pull in the correct image. |
I missed that this wasn't the pixie-operator helm chart, but the newrelic-pixie chart. I believe we need to replace this image with the one I mentioned above. |
After investigating this more, the |
The |
The curl container issue seems to be fixed with this update, but the main container (not the init container) now shows the same issue with exec format. |
This will be addressed once #1198 is merged and a new nri-bundle release is made. Thanks for all your help through this @maxlemieux! |
All attempts at reproducing this issue failed, or not enough information was available to reproduce the issue. Reading the code produces no clues as to why this behavior would occur. If more information appears later, please reopen the issue. |
Bug description
newrelic-pixie
chart fails to install to arm64 nodes.Version of Helm and Kubernetes
Any versions, where the nodes are arm64 type. Tested on AKS, Kubernetes v1.26.6 with node pool template
Standard_D2pds_v5
(arm64)Which chart?
What happened?
The newrelic-pixie job fails 5 times in quick succession after scheduling to an arm64 node.
Logs for the
cluster-registration-wait
container include this message:What you expected to happen?
Expecting the init container to work with arm64.
How to reproduce it?
Add an arm64 node pool to your cluster. Taint the other node groups. Process per this guide.
Install the New Relic bundle with Pixie enabled.
Anything else we need to know?
This is the container image for the container that's not running on arm64:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: