Missing .tarball-version file in official glogg-0.9.2.tar.gz

[dwrobel]

There is no .tarball-version file in the official 0.9.2 tarball which results in the following messages:

g++ -c -pipe -g -Wextra -DGLOGG_DATE="date +"%F""
-DGLOGG_VERSION="git describe" -DGLOGG_COMMIT="git rev-parse --short HEAD" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic -O2 -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/lib64/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/QtCore -I/usr/include/QtGui -I/usr/include -I.moc/release-shared -I. -o .obj/release-shared/main.o main.cpp
fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /home)
Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_ACROSS_FILESYSTEM not set).

As a result there is no correct version available in the Help->About menu.

[nickbnf]

That's correct. I modified my release script and did it wrong, I'll do
a re-packaging of the 0.9.2 tarball and post a news on the website so
that package maintainers use this new one.

Thanks for the report.

Nic

On 10/10/13 12:26, dwrobel wrote:

There is not .tarball-version file in the official 0.9.2 tarball which
results in the following messages:

g++ -c -pipe -g -Wextra -DGLOGG_DATE="|date +"%F"|"
-DGLOGG_VERSION="|git describe|" -DGLOGG_COMMIT="|git rev-parse
--short HEAD|" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64
-mtune=generic -O2 -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_GUI_LIB
-DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/lib64/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I.
-I/usr/include/QtCore -I/usr/include/QtGui -I/usr/include
-I.moc/release-shared -I. -o .obj/release-shared/main.o main.cpp
fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /home)
Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_ACROSS_FILESYSTEM not set).

As a result there is no correct version available in the Help->About menu.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#49.

[dwrobel]

It would be better to release new version (0.9.2.1) as I already commited workaround for Fedora packages:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/glogg.git/commit/?id=0190720966a127e1a7db6c40821456a0a04df27c

[nickbnf]

Yes I could do that but won't it make you release another package for
0.9.2.1? Or your users might wonder why they don't have the latest version.

Sorry, I didn't realise you were the Fedora maintainer and had already
done the work!

Nic

On 10/10/13 14:17, dwrobel wrote:

It would be better to release new version (0.9.2.1) as I already
commited workaround for Fedora packages:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/glogg.git/commit/?id=0190720966a127e1a7db6c40821456a0a04df27c

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#49 (comment).

[dwrobel]

If the only difference between those versions will be the missing file it wouldn't have be a problem at all.
In other words I wouldn't make new version because of that.

[nickbnf]

Released 0.9.2.1 tarball to fix this problem. No other change.