You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It was alluded to at the AMS conference that the initial implementations of horizontal in-canopy wind parameterizations are not yet fully consistent with the Raupauch method for simple modified eddy diffusivity/turbulence in canopy-app.
This is rather expected, but it could be a goal to improve consistency and unify these horizontal and vertical momentum variables in canopy-app using more robustly coupling. This may be a larger task involved later eventually connecting canopy-app with the UFS through CCPP in issue #32.
We should start with ACCESS physics model first, and then maybe leverage some of Bonan et al. (2018) unified RSL/stability approach to modeling canopy turbulence in CLM. Ultimately, it may be best to combine vertical turbulence (i.e., eddy diffusivity, i.e., 'caneddy') and winds (i.e., 'canwind') options together and create a new 'canturb' module/option so that one that is more self consistent between horizontal and vertical momentum.
Overall, this could be a simplified manner to combine issue #62 for momentum #64 for heat/moisture to create 'canturb' that gives winds, heat, and vapor/moisture profiles self consistently through profile.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
drnimbusrain
changed the title
Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal Winds and Vertical Turbulence
Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Turbulence, i.e., 'canturb'
May 15, 2023
drnimbusrain
changed the title
Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Turbulence, i.e., 'canturb'
Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Turbulence (and heat/moisture)
May 16, 2023
drnimbusrain
changed the title
Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Turbulence (and heat/moisture)
[Physics] Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Turbulence
Sep 6, 2023
Ideas are to approximate higher level turbulence closure formulations included in full 1D canopy turbulence models, like ACASA or something else from the many works of Bonan et al.
drnimbusrain
changed the title
[Physics] Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Turbulence
[Physics] Full Turbulence: Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Motions/Fluxes
Sep 15, 2023
drnimbusrain
changed the title
[Physics] Full Turbulence: Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Motions/Fluxes
[Physics] Full Turbulence Closure: Rectifying Consistency Between Horizontal and Vertical Motions/Fluxes
Sep 15, 2023
It was alluded to at the AMS conference that the initial implementations of horizontal in-canopy wind parameterizations are not yet fully consistent with the Raupauch method for simple modified eddy diffusivity/turbulence in canopy-app.
This is rather expected, but it could be a goal to improve consistency and unify these horizontal and vertical momentum variables in canopy-app using more robustly coupling. This may be a larger task involved later eventually connecting canopy-app with the UFS through CCPP in issue #32.
We should start with ACCESS physics model first, and then maybe leverage some of Bonan et al. (2018) unified RSL/stability approach to modeling canopy turbulence in CLM. Ultimately, it may be best to combine vertical turbulence (i.e., eddy diffusivity, i.e., 'caneddy') and winds (i.e., 'canwind') options together and create a new 'canturb' module/option so that one that is more self consistent between horizontal and vertical momentum.
Overall, this could be a simplified manner to combine issue #62 for momentum #64 for heat/moisture to create 'canturb' that gives winds, heat, and vapor/moisture profiles self consistently through profile.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: