Delete smoke-test team and archive repo?

[Trott]

The @nodejs/smoke-test team is inactive and seems to have been superseded by @nodejs/citgm.

Additionally the smoke-test repo at https://github.com/nodejs/smoke-test seems to be archivable.

Any objections to deleting the team and archiving the repo? @nodejs/tsc @nodejs/community-committee

I'll wait 72 hours before taking any actions.

[Trott]

(If I really had my druthers, I'd say let's rename the citgm team to smoke-test. IMO the teams should be named for their function, not the name of the tool that they use to perform the function. However, more important than that is that people intuitively know what the name of the team is and so if people are used to calling it the citgm team, then we should stick with that. Thank you for reading this pointless pondering.)

[MylesBorins]

I'd say delete team. Citgm team lives under release to manage collaborators for citgm so likely shouldn't change

…

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, 12:13 AM Rich Trott ***@***.***> wrote: (If I *really* had my druthers, I'd say let's rename the citgm team to smoke-test. IMO the teams should be named for their function, not the name of the tool that they use to perform the function. But more important than that is that people intuitively know what the name of the team is and so if people are used to calling it the citgm team, then we should stick with that. Thank you for reading this pointless pondering.) — You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#71 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV47BswXodFDC27FjyI9mmc_04-Qnks5tW6YPgaJpZM4SNFm1> .

[gibfahn]

IMO the teams should be named for their function, not the name of the tool that they use to perform the function.

The CitGM team exclusively manages the CitGM tool, they don't actually manage smoke-testing. Collaborators manage smoke-testing.

[Trott]

Team deleted, repository archived.