-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Batch version ? #11
Comments
Hi Zimoun, Please download the latest release and look in the file: X-shift_standalone_README.txt There should be instructions for the headless computation of X-shift Also if you are experiencing the problems with performance, try limiting the number of cells that get sampled from each file. Standalone X-shift will automatically upsample the files upon completing the clustering so that each cell in the source FCS files gets assigned to a cluster. Hope this helps |
Hi, Thank you for your pointer. My repo is updated to the commit 6a3d530 and there is no file named All the best |
It’s not on the GitHub - Can you please download it with the latest release?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:47 AM zimoun ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your pointer.
However, I am not able to find the file that you mention.
My repo is updated to the commit 6a3d530
<6a3d530>
and there is no file named X-shift_standalone_README.txt. Have you pushed
it ?
All the best
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADacLxBPA4fSbjlzaBJATC_xlMV-p1c3ks5tjNfwgaJpZM4Q60lT>
.
--
Nikolay
…----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended for the named addressee(s) only. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and protected by a copyright. Any
disclosure, copying or distribution of this message is prohibited and may
be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message and notify me immediately. Thank you for your cooperation.
|
Download from where ? |
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:58 AM zimoun ***@***.***> wrote:
Download from where ?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADacL3sHg85MdmHjd3xmPFZdm2XABxhqks5tmyK4gaJpZM4Q60lT>
.
--
Nikolay
…----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended for the named addressee(s) only. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and protected by a copyright. Any
disclosure, copying or distribution of this message is prohibited and may
be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message and notify me immediately. Thank you for your cooperation.
|
Dear,
I am trying to run
vortex
on large samples and it does not fit into the memory of my "standard multicore workstation" with 23GB of RAM.Moreover, I have access to a cluster with much more RAM. However, there is no X server, i.e., the GUI cannot be enable on some node.
What is the way to launch computations from the command-line ?
In other words, the way to feed the database without any GUI ? (then explore the data with the GUI using another machine)
Since in my case, all is mounted with NFS-like, so the storage it is not a real issue.
The issue comes from the computational power available under X server (GUI).
I am not a Java programmer so I have not dived into the code.
Is it already possible ? playing around the command-line
java
option1 option2 options. How ?Or should it be a plan to split
vortex
: a Lib controlled by a Gui or a command-line parser ?How much do you think this appears to you as amount of work ?
Thank you in advance for any point of view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: