Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recursion pt 3 #260

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

mitschabaude
Copy link
Contributor

@mitschabaude mitschabaude commented Jun 23, 2022

Follow-up to #250, fills in some missing pieces

  • serialize proofs
  • simplify accessing Proof classes
  • serialize verification key
  • (final) verification of ZkProgram proofs

@mitschabaude mitschabaude changed the title feature/recursion io Recursion pt 3 Jun 23, 2022
@mitschabaude mitschabaude marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2022 10:52
@@ -32,16 +33,53 @@ class Proof<T> {
verifyIf(condition: Bool) {
this.shouldVerify = condition;
}
toString() {
toTransactionString() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this called toTransactionString and not toString?

@mitschabaude mitschabaude deleted the branch feature/recursion-2 June 27, 2022 11:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants