Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CPE #324

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 24, 2021
Merged

CPE #324

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 24, 2021

Conversation

tschmidtb51
Copy link
Contributor

- resolves oasis-tcs#91
- add manual test for CPE regex against official dictionaries
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#91 and oasis-tcs#38
- add new workflow for CPE test
@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 added csaf 2.0 csaf 2.0 work test related to tests in this repo labels Jul 24, 2021
@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2021
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#91 and oasis-tcs#38
- add newline at EOF
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#91 and oasis-tcs#38
- clarify steps by providing names
I met with spellcheck and she likes this version more.

Maybe some intrinsic expansions were secretly needed to make the script work ... then I am happy to revert / adapt.
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
#!/bin/bash

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my own daily work, I tend to have a `# synopsis like sigle line comment always on line 2 ... should we do this here too?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feel free to do so.

@@ -2,3 +2,5 @@
meeting_minutes/.DS_Store
.DS_Store
*_strict_schema.json
official-cpe-dictionary_v2.3.*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can imagine a single official-cpe-dictionary_v2* would do but I am +0 on just keeping your version - after all it is only a git ignore file.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 Jul 24, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tend to be a bit more specific in .gitignore as it helps me to avoid the "works on my machine". But I'm happy with both variants... So that's up to you.

Do not know if this is practical and this should also work.

... what could possibly go wrong, right?
Copy link
Contributor

@sthagen sthagen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed the driver and the validator without testing and hope the testing happens within this PR mechanics ... hope helps 😁 - it worked (I usually do not change that much as reviewer ... esp. without prior verification).

Note: I have no problem when my commits are reverted (I approve the PR never the less).

Let us merge this fast, it is a very good contribution I think. Thank you so much @tschmidtb51 !

@santosomar
Copy link
Contributor

Let the tests start 😜 I will merge now.

@santosomar santosomar merged commit 53be8f7 into oasis-tcs:master Jul 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
csaf 2.0 csaf 2.0 work test related to tests in this repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CPE regex
3 participants