-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optional Test: Same Timestamps in Revision History #744
Optional Test: Same Timestamps in Revision History #744
Conversation
tschmidtb51
commented
May 27, 2024
- resolves Add test: same timestamps in revision history #627
- add optional test that warns if two timestamps in the revision history are the same
- add invalid examples for 6.2.21
- add valid examples for 6.2.21
- update testcase and schema for testcases
- resolves oasis-tcs#627 - add optional test that warns if two timestamps in the revision history are the same - add invalid examples for 6.2.21 - add valid examples for 6.2.21 - update testcase and schema for testcases
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#744 - correct metadata of valid example 3 of 6.2.21 - unify metadata of invalid example 3 of 6.2.21 - fix invalid JSON
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (only one rewording maybe).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about the following text in order to make it easier to understand and grammatically correct:
"When converted to UTC, the timestamps of all items in the revision history MUST be tested to ensure that are unique and do not overlap (i.e., pairwise disjoint)."
- addresses review comment from oasis-tcs#744 - state clearly that conversion needs to happen first
@sthagen, @santosomar: I added a sentence for implementers regarding the UTC conversion. I think that should resolve the discussion. |
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#627 - add invalid examples for 6.2.21
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍🏽
- addresses review comment from oasis-tcs#744 - simplify requirement on comparison
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ship it! 😁
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you 🙏
The motion to accept the pull request as suggested in #744 and include it into CSAF 2.1, has passed. It automatically carried on 2024-06-07 23:00 UTC. https://groups.oasis-open.org/discussion/motion-for-744 |
…to same-timestamps
1f005f2
into
oasis-tcs:editor-revision-2024-05-29