Various editorial change proposals

[Denisthemalice]

In Section 1.3 (Design Considerations), the text states:

• the specification shall design an extension point to convey information about the status of a token that can be re-used by other mechanisms

Change into:

• the specification defines a "status" claim in a Reference Token that can be used by other mechanisms to convey information about the status of a Reference Token.

In section 3 (Terminology) the text defines the term as Relying Party as:

Relying Party: An entity that relies on the Status List Token to validate the status of the Referenced Token. Also known as Verifier.

Change into:

Relying Party: An entity that relies on a "status" claim that is present in a Reference Token and can fetch a Status List Token or obtain it from the Holder to validate the status of that Referenced Token. Also known as Verifier.

In section 3 (Terminology) the text defines the term Referenced Token as:

Referenced Token: A cryptographically secured data structure which contains a reference to a Status List Token. (...)

Change into:

Referenced Token: A cryptographically secured data structure which contains a "status" claim that allows to discover how the status of a Referenced Token can be known. In the context of this document, the "status" claim contains one or more references to Status List Tokens and an index specific to that Referenced Token. (...)

[paulbastian]

I used some of the suggestions in #241 , I think some are too detailed for the terminology section.