Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does the develop branch of libcoap support lwIP #3

Closed
fanghuaqi opened this issue Sep 2, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Does the develop branch of libcoap support lwIP #3

fanghuaqi opened this issue Sep 2, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@fanghuaqi
Copy link

I tried to clone the source code, and follow the get started guide, but it seems the lwip example can't be compiled successfully. So I am wondering if the lwip support is still under development?

@obgm
Copy link
Owner

obgm commented Sep 2, 2015

Hi Fang Huaqi,

Fang Huaqi notifications@github.com writes:

I tried to clone the source code, and follow the get started guide,
but it seems the lwip example can't be compiled successfully. So I am
wondering if the lwip support is still under development?

Last time I checked, the example worked, but I will look into this. (The
CI is still work in progress and hence has no job to check the lwip code.)

Best regards
Olaf

@fanghuaqi
Copy link
Author

OK, thanks a lot, once you have some update for this test, could you kindly let me know, thanks a lot.

@chrysn
Copy link
Contributor

chrysn commented Oct 14, 2015

the development head is currently missing the CPPFLAGS=-DWITH_LWIP flags, otherwise it at least builds and runs a very very limited demo server.

i'm in the process of updating the lwip port to integrate better with the latest libcoap infrastructure and will update this bug when mergable fixes are available.

@obgm
Copy link
Owner

obgm commented Feb 16, 2016

I have added WITH_LWIP and checked that at least the build process works again.
You may want to check on non-posix platforms, though.

@obgm obgm closed this as completed Feb 16, 2016
@Alveraz
Copy link

Alveraz commented Feb 13, 2017

I want to know whether the POSIX means OS or stardard TCP/IP protocol?

@obgm
Copy link
Owner

obgm commented Feb 13, 2017

POSIX as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX. libcoap supports standard IP as in RFC 2460 (and some support for legacy IP as of RFC 792, though). No TCP yet.

mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2022
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2022
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2022
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2022
mrdeep1 added a commit to mrdeep1/libcoap that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2023
Addresses issue with HKDF and HMAC usage by clearly setting out
what is happening as TLS libraries only support HMAC.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants