Skip to content

Conversation

mbostock
Copy link
Member

@mbostock mbostock commented May 17, 2023

Fixes #1523.

@mbostock mbostock requested a review from Fil May 17, 2023 05:14
@Fil
Copy link
Contributor

Fil commented May 17, 2023

There was a regression on the walmart raster tests, but I don't think it makes sense to force a diverging scheme onto a temporal scale (with a default pivot at unix epoch?). I'm suggesting a different priority order in #1569.

@mbostock mbostock enabled auto-merge (squash) May 17, 2023 14:52
mbostock and others added 2 commits May 17, 2023 08:18
* add missing test result

* test the scheme after the domain and channels have been checked

* scheme-less asOrdinalType

---------

Co-authored-by: Mike Bostock <mbostock@gmail.com>
@mbostock mbostock force-pushed the mbostock/implicit-categorical branch from e365e50 to a2736b8 Compare May 17, 2023 15:18
@mbostock mbostock merged commit 168e8bf into main May 17, 2023
@mbostock mbostock deleted the mbostock/implicit-categorical branch May 17, 2023 15:20
chaichontat pushed a commit to chaichontat/plot that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2024
* implicit categorical color scale

* implicit categorical color scale (observablehq#1569)

* add missing test result

* test the scheme after the domain and channels have been checked

* scheme-less asOrdinalType

---------

Co-authored-by: Mike Bostock <mbostock@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Philippe Rivière <fil@rezo.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Assume a categorical scale when scheme is categorical
2 participants