Skip to content

vite #678

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2022
Merged

vite #678

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2022

Conversation

mbostock
Copy link
Member

A significant reduction in dependencies, and whereas snowpack is no longer under active development, vite is.

Ref. https://dev.to/fredkschott/5-more-things-i-learned-building-snowpack-to-20-000-stars-5dc9

To be honest, I'm not sure where Snowpack goes from here. I burnt out on it at the end of last year, and haven't found the energy to return. Usage and downloads began to trend down and the community has gotten quieter.

At the same time, Vite (that Snowpack alternative that now powers SvelteKit) is taking off. To their credit, they do a lot of things really well. The good news is that two tools are very similar and easy to switch out. Even Astro is experimenting with moving from Snowpack to Vite in a future release.

Before:
chart (1)

After:
chart-8

@mbostock mbostock requested a review from Fil January 17, 2022 22:43
@mbostock mbostock merged commit f37cbd2 into main Jan 18, 2022
@mbostock mbostock deleted the mbostock/vite branch January 18, 2022 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants