Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strange sorting #52

Closed
Cr0c81 opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Strange sorting #52

Cr0c81 opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@Cr0c81
Copy link

Cr0c81 commented Aug 17, 2020

How sort in output (JSON array)? I have 6 files atlas and need sort by name (because use animation), but elements placed in random atlas.
image

@nonunknown
Copy link

Yeah I agree, Optimal packer's method should have a sortByName method, this way you can have animations organized, and play in sequence.
Screenshot from 2020-08-22 09-38-55

@Cr0c81
Copy link
Author

Cr0c81 commented Aug 24, 2020 via email

@odrick
Copy link
Owner

odrick commented Apr 28, 2021

This is not the responsibility of the texture packer. The purpose of the texture packer is to create the most optimal atlases. Generating animation is the task of an application that uses atlases. By design.

@odrick odrick closed this as completed Apr 28, 2021
@lmf-git
Copy link

lmf-git commented Aug 14, 2021

What the fuck.

@lmf-git
Copy link

lmf-git commented Aug 14, 2021

How is it not the responsibility of this tool to output in a reasonable way compared to input?

What a stupid cop out and a complete deal breaker for actually using this thing.

Why would you just completely write off all of the great work that has been done on this tool by dropping the ball on the last .5%? Absolutely insane.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants