Skip to content

Collect and disseminate information on fee-based Open Access publishing

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

olurolur/openapc-de

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

About

The aim of this repository is:

  • to release datasets on fees paid for Open Access journal articles by Universities and Research Society Funds under an Open Database License
  • to demonstrate how reporting on fee-based Open Access publishing can be made more transparent and reproducible across institutions.

Participating Universities

So far, the following German universities have agreed to share information on paid author processing charges (APC):

Participating Research Society Funds in Germany

Dataset on funds that are supported by research societies under its Open-Access Publishing Programme.

Participating Research Organizations:

The data content covers APCs as paid for by our central budget for the Max Planck Society (MPS). APCs funded locally by Max Planck Institutes are not part of this data set. The MPS has a limited input tax reduction. The refund of input VAT for APC is 20%. Until the end of 2007 the MPS was VAT exempt.

Participating Austrian Institutions

Participating Institutions from the United Kingdom:

Dataset

Information on both open access journal articles and open access publication of articles in toll-access journals ("hybrid") are provided.

In total, 26 412 682 € for 15 273 articles were paid by the participating universities. Average fee is 1 729.4 € and the median 1 492 €.

Open Access Journals

At the moment, the dataset releases information on 10 570 articles in open access journals which charge publication fees. Total expenditure amounts to 14 284 595 €. Average fee is 1 351.4 € and the median 1 269 €.

View dataset on GitHub or take a look at our treemap visualisations.

Articles Fees paid in EURO Mean Fee paid Median
Bamberg U 22 23663 1076 1009
Bayreuth U 92 105725 1149 1200
Bielefeld U 263 322815 1227 1232
Bochum U 71 93546 1318 1438
Bremen U 264 335873 1272 1246
Dortmund TU 28 26410 943 826
Duisburg-Essen U 147 178437 1214 1212
Erlangen Nuernberg U 402 551812 1373 1424
FU Berlin 106 142671 1346 1292
FWF - Austrian Science Fund 731 1016441 1390 1271
FZJ - ZB 158 196869 1246 1177
GFZ-Potsdam 106 126520 1194 1065
Giessen U 317 428690 1352 1273
Goettingen U 650 883918 1360 1354
Hamburg TUHH 24 32789 1366 1466
Hannover U 69 90259 1308 1241
Heidelberg U 215 308348 1434 1500
INM - Leibniz-Institut für Neue Materialien 5 5744 1149 1305
Kassel U 35 35550 1016 1142
KIT 428 524346 1225 1239
Konstanz U 223 304182 1364 1342
Leibniz-Fonds 56 92730 1656 1586
Leipzig U 173 243873 1410 1471
MDC 51 103028 2020 1483
MPG 2990 3879721 1298 1178
Muenchen LMU 365 463491 1270 1299
Potsdam U 24 32128 1339 1386
Regensburg U 400 503845 1260 1207
TU Chemnitz 40 39454 986 1056
TU Clausthal 8 6999 875 918
TU Dresden 130 175723 1352 1415
TU Ilmenau 17 18540 1091 1046
TU Muenchen 308 390086 1267 1386
Tuebingen U 411 548124 1334 1346
Wellcome Trust 772 1457126 1887 1823
Wuerzburg U 469 595119 1269 1266

Hybrid articles

In many toll-access journals some of the articles are open access after a fee has been paid. This model is often called "hybrid open access". The dataset covers 4 703 hybrid open access articles. Total expenditure amounts to 12 128 086 €. Average fee is 2 578.8 € and the median 2 618 €.

The following institutions have contributed its expenditures for hybrid open access.

Articles Fees paid in EURO Mean Fee paid Median
Dortmund TU 1 1581 1581 1581
Duisburg-Essen U 1 2618 2618 2618
FWF - Austrian Science Fund 2582 6170854 2390 2515
INM - Leibniz-Institut für Neue Materialien 9 27020 3002 3213
MDC 18 42227 2346 1996
MPG 40 63548 1589 1669
TU Chemnitz 1 100 100 100
Wellcome Trust 2051 5820138 2838 2743

Use of external sources

External sources were used to compile the dataset. This allows for disambiguated information on publishers and journals in order to make cost data comparable. Shared identifiers for publications (e.g. PMID) are provided as well.

Source variable description
CrossRef publisher Title of Publisher
CrossRef journal_full_title Full Title of Journal
CrossRef issn International Standard Serial Numbers (collapsed)
CrossRef issn_print ISSN print
CrossRef issn_electronic ISSN electronic
CrossRef license_ref License of the article
CrossRef indexed_in_crossref Is the article metadata registered with CrossRef? (logical)
EuropePMC pmid PubMed ID
EuropePMC pmcid PubMed Central ID
Web of Science ut Web of Science record ID
DOAJ doaj Is the journal indexed in the DOAJ? (logical)
Identifier Coverage
DOI 99.44%
PubMed ID 77.64%
PubMed Central ID 74.03%
Web of Science record ID 88.51%

Sample Visualisations

Distribution over publishers by university

Comparing fees paid by university and research institution

Average fees paid by publisher

Average fees Max Planck Digital Library paid for Springer Open Access articles by year

For more examples see also http://openapc.github.io/openapc-de/

How to contribute?

In collaboration with the DINI working group Electronic Publishing, a wiki page(in German) explains all the steps required. Meeting and telephone conferences are documented as well:

License

The datasets are made available under the Open Database License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/. Any rights in individual contents of the database are licensed under the Database Contents License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.

How to cite?

When citing this dataset, please indicate the release you are referring to. The releases also contain information on contributors relating to the respective release.

Please do not cite the master branch of the Github repository (https://github.com/OpenAPC/openapc-de/tree/master/), but use the release numbers/tags.

Bielefeld University Library archives a copy (including commit history). To cite:

{Contributors:} Datasets on fee-based Open Access publishing across German Institutions. Bielefeld University. 10.4119/UNIBI/UB.2014.18

Acknowledgement

This project follows Wellcome Trust example to share data on paid APCs. It recognises efforts from JISC and the ESAC initative to standardise APC reporting.

For data enrichment, sample visualisations and explorations we build on the work of rOpenSci and LibreCat/Catmandu.

Contributors

Benjamin Ahlborn, Jochen Apel, Hans-Georg Becker, Roland Bertelmann, Daniel Beucke, Peter Blume, Ute Blumtritt, Christoph Broschinski, Dorothea Busjahn, Gernot Deinzer, Andrea Dorner, Clemens Engelhardt, Kristina Hanig, Dominik Hell, Ulrich Herb, Ute Holzwarth, Inken Feldsien-Sudhaus, Fabian Franke, Claudia Frick, Agnes Geißelmann, Kai Karin Geschuhn, Gerrit Kuehle, Doris Jaeger, Andreas Kennecke, Robert Kiley, Stephanie Kroiss, Kathrin Lucht-Roussel, Frank Lützenkirchen, Anja Oberländer, Vitali Peil, Dirk Pieper, Tobias Pohlmann, Markus Putnings, Michael Schlachter, Katharina Rieck, Florian Ruckelshausen, Birgit Schlegel, Adriana Sikora, Marco Tullney, Astrid Vieler, Marco Winkler, Sabine Witt, Najko Jahn

Contact

For bugs, feature requests and other issues, please submit an issue via Github.

For general comments, email najko.jahn at uni-bielefeld.de and dirk.pieper at uni-bielefeld.de

Disclaimer

People, who are looking for "Open Advanced Process Control Software" for automation, visualization and process control tasks from home control up to industrial automation, please follow http://www.openapc.com (2015-09-30)

About

Collect and disseminate information on fee-based Open Access publishing

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Python 80.2%
  • R 16.3%
  • Perl 3.5%