Help replacement suggestions

[pwalczysko]

This PR is on top of #396

The suggestions from the comments on #396 are implemented here.

Namely:

• improved perfomance of imports link WIP: Help replacement #396 (comment)
• reworking of searching and filtering WIP: Help replacement #396 (comment) (did not go precisely for the suggestion as specified in the WIP: Help replacement #396, instead, adjusted it so that the layout matches better with the "browsing and filtering" icon (see next point)
• "browse and view" changed to "browse and filter" and points to data management guide rather then iviewer WIP: Help replacement #396 (comment)
• the |view" icon on next page is changed fora newly created one, to make difference between browsing and viewing
• swapped the order of buttons under the permissions icon WIP: Help replacement #396 (comment)
• swapped the order of buttons under the unit icon WIP: Help replacement #396 (comment)
• reworked the attaching of analytical results completely, replacing the links and also creating a new icon with "3rd party analysis apps" WIP: Help replacement #396 (comment)
• swapped the ROI folders icon under "New" with the new "3rd party analysis apps" icon and links
• replaced the link under the "new HCS layout" in "New" for a more precise guide

Happy to open this PR against your branch @jburel later, opening this as a separate PR now so that we can see the effects on snoopy.

[jburel]

happy to close #396 and keep this PR

[jburel]

@pwalczysko looks better

[will-moore]

All seems fine. Tested a few links (not all) and they look good.

[jburel]

@pwalczysko the new "analyse" for 3rd party tool icon: It will be better if the histogram/magnifying glass was centered
see

[will-moore]

Not due to this PR, but it seems that the gap between the text and buttons is too large:

This is due to css:

.omero-feature-container.tall-content > p {
    min-height: 80px;
}

Could you try removing all the tall-content classes from the analyze page?
The other pages that use this are the sibling pages: import/, publish/, utility/ and view/.
But since this is not related to this PR, it could be handled later.

[pwalczysko]

@will-moore I have made the change you suggest locally (removal of all tall-content from all the pages you mention (basically, all what there is of that on the www). This made the space between buttons and text smaller and nicer as you expected. But, the price we pay is an uneven button row, as some texts are 3-liners, some just 2-liners, see screenshots below
Berfore:

Now

[pwalczysko]

@will-moore I think I have it sorted in f802668 - seems like a good compromise - no long text buttons, no 4-line blurbs, but for that, all buttons in the same row now and the gap is not too large. See what you think

[will-moore]

Built locally... looks good 👍

[pwalczysko]

The comment #401 (comment) is fixed in e046377

Rebuilt the snoopy too. See https://snoopycrimecop.github.io/www.openmicroscopy.org/omero/features/analyze/ and the sister pages and downloads.

[sbesson]

Generally looks good. A few comments with the primary suggestion being to clean up our custom png files if we are definitely switching to the svg versions instead.

In addition to promoting the OMERO guides from the main website, a secondary advantage of this linking is that the HTML proofer will flag potential broken links.

[pwalczysko]

Fixes pushed and deployed on https://snoopycrimecop.github.io/www.openmicroscopy.org/omero/features/analyze/

[sbesson]

Looks good thanks.

The only inconsistency I can spot now is https://snoopycrimecop.github.io/www.openmicroscopy.org/explore/ which uses a mixture of http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/registry/demo_account/ and https://demo.openmicroscopy.org/signup/ for the signup link/button. This brings us back to the discussion started in ome/ome-help#334 (comment) for the complete resolution. I'd still vote for using http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/registry/demo_account/ as the intermediate page at the expense of the extra click (www explore -> qa demo_acount -> demo sign up) until the SLA is migrated as suggested in the thread above.

Apart from this issue, given that help now redirects, I am inclined to get this deployed asap.

[pwalczysko]

I'd still vote for using http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/registry/demo_account/ as the intermediate page at the expense of the extra click

Fixed in 7903192 - this whole section might need a bit of rearrangement, but possibly this is a good compromise.

[sbesson]

Thanks. Agreed the demo sign-up workflow needs more attention. I would say that at the very least this PR reduces the number of potential entrypoints from 4 (www + qa + help + demo) to 3 (www + qa + demo) so it's an incremental improvement.

[pwalczysko]

Built on https://snoopycrimecop.github.io/www.openmicroscopy.org/explore/

Should I merge and deploy cc @jburel ?

[jburel]

It looks good. gfi