Skip to content

Conversation

mauvilsa
Copy link
Member

Before submitting

  • Did you read the contributing guideline?
  • Did you update the documentation? (readme and public docstrings)
  • Did you write unit tests such that there is 100% coverage on related code? (required for bug fixes and new features)
  • Did you verify that new and existing tests pass locally?
  • Did you make sure that all changes preserve backward compatibility?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or minor internal changes/refactors)

@mauvilsa mauvilsa added the refactor Improvements to the quality of the code label Nov 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (42c1cae) to head (73335e8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #634   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           22        22           
  Lines         6497      6482   -15     
=========================================
- Hits          6497      6482   -15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@mauvilsa mauvilsa merged commit e9eca4c into main Dec 2, 2024
30 checks passed
@mauvilsa mauvilsa deleted the deprecate-add-dataclass branch December 2, 2024 06:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Improvements to the quality of the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant