add flanksource as a member

[moshloop]

No description provided.

[scottrigby]

This definitely needs to be resolved. It's come up several times in meetings but now that the website is up let's prioritize this #22

[scottrigby]

@moshloop would you contribute to conversation about #22? I don't think this is correct as-is, unfortunately. I do think we need to prioritize having a clear way to list orgs that current working group members are part of, and/or from the interested parties document: https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/blob/main/interested-parties.md

[todaywasawesome]

@moshloop I suggest making a separate PR to add flanksource as a member while we figure out how to resolve a "current" maintainers callout. We could get that added right away.

[todaywasawesome]

@moshloop For now, let's remove the featured-members.js so we can get you added right away and then figure out #22

[moshloop]

@todaywasawesome I disagree, if anything we should remove founding members completely, and add them back in the form of a PR.

The charter is explicit in that this WG is a:

1. Time-Bound (In which case Founding and Current are not relevant)
2. Vendor-Neutral, By differentiating between "membership" levels by definition you are not neutral.

[scottrigby]

@moshloop the order of operations here is up to you. This PR is about adding Flanksource, not fully resolving #22 which requires agreeing on a solution, so I believe scope creep in this PR is holding up adding your company. By contrast, see #26 which was easy to merge even before 22 is solved.

[lloydchang]

Relates to open-gitops/project#34 (comment)

[scottrigby]

@moshloop circling back on this. Would you like to update this PR per review feedback, or would you rather close this PR? To reiterate #16 (comment) there is nothing blocking adding this company as a member – there has been unblocking maintainer feedback since July and August 2021.

As mentioned in our meetings, in Slack and GitHub, it will be exciting to see Flanksource – and all member orgs – listed on the website. Finishing this PR will help with that. We also need additional help with this for the other orgs, in #56.

Thanks in advance

[moshloop]

@scottrigby I have added a founding and a current tag to members - what defines current can be addressed in the future

[scottrigby]

@moshloop this lgtm now 💯 Thanks for updating. I somehow didn't register that you had resolved the issue above 2 months ago.

Dan's comment was resolved