Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grooming of Build Balise Group Message: Development #18

Open
4 of 9 tasks
BerndHekele opened this issue Mar 20, 2014 · 2 comments
Open
4 of 9 tasks

Grooming of Build Balise Group Message: Development #18

BerndHekele opened this issue Mar 20, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@BerndHekele
Copy link
Member

Linked to #17
For the development of this item the following tasks are planned:

  • Document links between Scade model and Requirements (e.g., Reqtify)
  • Definition of Input (Scade Data Dictionary)
  • Definition of Output Ports (Scade Data Dictionary)
  • Definition of internal types and data
  • Scade model complete
  • Test-model available for function
  • Verification
  • Done (accepted by product owner(architect)
  • Integrate model
@BerndHekele BerndHekele self-assigned this Mar 21, 2014
BerndHekele added a commit to openETCS/modeling that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2014
Initial Scade model with interfaces from dictionary
BerndHekele added a commit to openETCS/modeling that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2014
Modelling completed but not module tested and not inspected
Model compiles
 - additional xscade file needs clarification
BerndHekele added a commit to openETCS/modeling that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2014
 - Add missing branch (bg changed),
 - ready for internal review
BerndHekele added a commit to openETCS/modeling that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2014
Some smaller changes in the definition of bg-message and telegram (present flag).
@BerndHekele
Copy link
Member Author

@UweSteinkeFromSiemens @Farhangi :
Based on feedback from Marc I need to rename this part of the model to its real function.
Since you are using this model in your integration project this will impact you.
I propose as a new name: ReceiveTelegramFromBTM.

Any objections?

br
Bernd

@UweSteinkeFromSiemens
Copy link
Contributor

I don't mind.

BerndHekele added a commit to openETCS/modeling that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2014
Interface changes implemented, first test results closed.
Model test is not yet completed.
BerndHekele added a commit to openETCS/modeling that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2014
refers to #40
This delivery is after first developer verification.
It also adresses the Uwe's findings.
Please, look for details to the comments in "issue 40"
BerndHekele added a commit to openETCS/modeling that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants