-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Return an explanation for Eco-Score exemptions #6092
Comments
This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. |
"L'Eco-Score n'est pas encore dispo pour cette catégorie." |
@teolemon it's not in current sprint ? |
@teolemon @stephanegigandet we got two options here:
Would you also like a different icon ? |
@alexgarel It should be "Eco-Score not applicable", as we do for "Nutri-Score not applicable". In fact we already compute it: https://uk.openfoodfacts.org/eco-score/not-applicable ecoscore_data: { And we will need a different icon, similar to the Nutri-Score not applicable icon. |
Discussed with @teolemon and @alexgarel:
|
…knowledge panels when not applicable (#6844) * not-applicable ecoscore and nutriscore attributes and panels #6092 #6774 * not-applicable ecoscore and nutriscore attributes and panels #6092 #6774 * not-applicable ecoscore and nutriscore attributes and panels #6092 #6774 * Update lib/ProductOpener/Lang.pm Co-authored-by: Alex Garel <alex@garel.org> * add test for category exempted from ecoscore Co-authored-by: Alex Garel <alex@garel.org>
What
The eco-score does not grade bottled waters, and there's no way to know why.
Describe the solution you'd like
Part of
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: