Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8257651: LambdaEagerInit.java test failed in 2 different ways #1616

Closed

Conversation

calvinccheung
Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung commented Dec 4, 2020

Please review this simple change for fixing the 2 issues as described in the bug report.

  • exclude the test from the hotspot_appcds_dynamic test group.

  • compile Asserts.java so that the class file will be located under the following dir .../JTwork/classes/.../runtime/cds/appcds/LambdaEagerInit.d/jdk/test/lib/

Passed hs-tier4 tests.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8257651: LambdaEagerInit.java test failed in 2 different ways

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1616/head:pull/1616
$ git checkout pull/1616

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 4, 2020

👋 Welcome back ccheung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

/label remove hotspot
/label add hotspot-runtime

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2020

@calvinccheung The hotspot label was not set.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 4, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2020

@calvinccheung
The hotspot-runtime label was successfully added.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2020 02:24
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 4, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 4, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2020

@calvinccheung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8257651: LambdaEagerInit.java test failed in 2 different ways

Reviewed-by: iklam, lfoltan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 34 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3eb6946: 8257732: Problem list TestJFRWithJMX for OL 8.2 until the issue is resolved
  • ac54900: 8257401: Use switch expressions in jdk.internal.net.http and java.net.http
  • 86b6575: 8257574: C2: "failed: parsing found no loops but there are some" assert failure
  • dede01e: 8257622: MemoryAccess methods are missing @ForceInline annotations
  • 1d2d981: 8257423: [PPC64] Support -XX:-UseInlineCaches
  • feabdde: 8251843: jfr/tool/TestPrintJSON.java fails intermittently
  • c6f93ec: 8257707: Fix incorrect format string in Http1HeaderParser
  • fbdc187: 8257624: C2: PhaseMacroExpand::eliminate_macro_nodes() crashes on out-of-bounds access into macro node array
  • fd6756e: 8257634: C2: Introduce IncrementalInliningForceCleanup diagnostic flag
  • af6b7f9: 8257743: Minimal build on AArch64 failed with --disable-precompiled-headers
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/e83639620739749834d91e026cfecb56529aa295...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

@lfoltan lfoltan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good Calvin!
Lois

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @iklam and @lfoltan for the review.

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 4, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 4, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2020

@calvinccheung Since your change was applied there have been 34 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3eb6946: 8257732: Problem list TestJFRWithJMX for OL 8.2 until the issue is resolved
  • ac54900: 8257401: Use switch expressions in jdk.internal.net.http and java.net.http
  • 86b6575: 8257574: C2: "failed: parsing found no loops but there are some" assert failure
  • dede01e: 8257622: MemoryAccess methods are missing @ForceInline annotations
  • 1d2d981: 8257423: [PPC64] Support -XX:-UseInlineCaches
  • feabdde: 8251843: jfr/tool/TestPrintJSON.java fails intermittently
  • c6f93ec: 8257707: Fix incorrect format string in Http1HeaderParser
  • fbdc187: 8257624: C2: PhaseMacroExpand::eliminate_macro_nodes() crashes on out-of-bounds access into macro node array
  • fd6756e: 8257634: C2: Introduce IncrementalInliningForceCleanup diagnostic flag
  • af6b7f9: 8257743: Minimal build on AArch64 failed with --disable-precompiled-headers
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/e83639620739749834d91e026cfecb56529aa295...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit d8ac76f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung deleted the 8257651-LambdaEagerInit branch December 4, 2020 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants