8321480: ISO 4217 Amendment 176 Update

[Karm]

backport ea06b5c JDK11 JDK-8321480 ISO 4217 Amendment 176 Update

depends on #559

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8321480 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8321480: ISO 4217 Amendment 176 Update (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

• Severin Gehwolf (@jerboaa - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/561/head:pull/561
$ git checkout pull/561

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/561
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/561/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 561

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 561

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/561.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back Karm! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/559 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@Karm This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8321480: ISO 4217 Amendment 176 Update

Reviewed-by: sgehwolf

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• edbdf05: 8336928: GHA: Bundle artifacts removal broken

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@jerboaa) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 03: Full - Incremental (bc18ee31)
• 02: Full - Incremental (01b9bf7c)
• 01: Full - Incremental (9c607c08)
• 00: Full (9c607c08)

[openjdk-notifier]

The parent pull request that this pull request depends on has now been integrated and the target branch of this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout pr-559-amendment-175-176
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

[Karm]

/approval request Backporting regular ISO 4217 update from JDK 11. It's currency data update plus bringing along a workaround for missing JDK-8310923 (no JUnit refactoring). Passes tests in jdk/test/java/util/Currency/.

[openjdk]

@Karm
8321480: The approval request has been created successfully.

[Karm]

Faild test:

FAILED: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#sslrooteccca
...
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 502 for URL: http://ocsps.ssl.com/
...

IMHO OCSP responder is just down...

[jerboaa]

What testing have you done?

[jerboaa]

This should only be a one-line change appending 8321480 to the last line. See the JDK 11u commit which does the same thing.

[Karm]

@jerboaa Ack. bc18ee3

[Karm]

@jerboaa

What testing have you done?

karm@laptop:~/Tools/jtreg/build/images/jtreg/bin ((jtreg-7.4+1))$
TIME=`date +%s`;mkdir -p test.${TIME}/jdk/JTwork test.${TIME}/jdk/JTreport; jtreg -a -ignore:quiet 
-w:test.${TIME}/jdk/JTwork -r:test.${TIME}/jdk/JTreport -jdk:/home/karm/workspaceRH/jdk8u/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/images/j2sdk-image/ 
/home/karm/workspaceRH/jdk8u/jdk/test/java/util/Currency/

Test results: passed: 5
Report written to /home/karm/Tools/jtreg/build/images/jtreg/bin/test.1724152749/jdk/JTreport/html/report.html
Results written to /home/karm/Tools/jtreg/build/images/jtreg/bin/test.1724152749/jdk/JTwork

[Karm]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@Karm
Your change (at version bc18ee3) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[jerboaa]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 439e910.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

• edbdf05: 8336928: GHA: Bundle artifacts removal broken

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@jerboaa @Karm Pushed as commit 439e910.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.