[PRE REVIEW]: A course on Geographic Data Science

[whedon]

Submitting author: @darribas (Daniel Arribas-Bel)
Repository: https://github.com/darribas/gds18
Version: v4.0
Editor: @labarba
Reviewers: @lheagy, @jsta

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @darribas. The JOSE editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@darribas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @labarba it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for the assigned editor (@labarba) to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #40 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[labarba]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[labarba]

👋 @lheagy — Would you like to review this submission to JOSE? Looks right up your alley! (If you're unable, could you recommend someone else? Thanks!)

[lheagy]

Hi @labarba: This looks really interesting! I would be happy to review :)

[labarba]

@whedon assign @lheagy as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @lheagy

[labarba]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[labarba]

@whedon check references

[whedon]

Attempting to check references...

[whedon]

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701619976 may be missing for title: Designing Learning Objects for Online Learning
- https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315763309-4 may be missing for title: Principles of enquiry-based learning
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338 may be missing for title: Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2017.1384734 may be missing for title: 50 years of data science
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_3 may be missing for title: Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017607301605 may be missing for title: Supervised regionalization methods: A survey

INVALID DOIs

- None

[labarba]

👋 @darribas — Doing the pre-checks on your paper, we've found that your references list is missing a bunch of DOIs. Check on the helpful suggestions of our bot ☝️
Please update your BibTeX entries to include the DOIs.

[labarba]

Hello, @jsta — Perhaps you may want to contribute a review for JOSE on this submission?

[darribas]

Hello,

Thanks very much @labarba for the suggestion. I've added those I've been able on 1cac024 but there are a few I cannot find them and I'm not sure they actually have any. In those cases, I've provided the url field to the official source. In the case of books, I've used the doi entry in bibtex, but entered ISBN:XXX with the book's ISBN. Happy to iterate if this is not the common practice, but I'm not sure all the entries have a DOI. Thanks!

[labarba]

@whedon check references

[whedon]

Attempting to check references...

[whedon]

OK DOIs

- http://doi.org/10.2307/1183338 is OK
- http://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2017.1384734 is OK
- http://doi.org/ISBN:978-0-471-73545-8 is OK
- http://doi.org/10.1177/0160017607301605  is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701619976 may be missing for title: Designing Learning Objects for Online Learning
- https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526401717.n4 may be missing for title: Principles of enquiry-based learning

INVALID DOIs

- None

[labarba]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[labarba]

@darribas : You shouldn't use the doi field for ISBNs (that turns into a broken link). The two "missing DOIs" suggested by whedon are false leads.

[labarba]

Also, you need { } around GIS in https://github.com/darribas/gds18/blob/1cac024f860caa9bbd31b47df937b9377daf724a/paper.bib#L83

[jsta]

I'm happy to contribute a review on this paper @labarba

[labarba]

@whedon add @jsta as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @jsta is now a reviewer

[labarba]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #42. Feel free to close this issue now!